Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension Faculty of Agriculture, Nasarawa State University, Keffi


The study determined the willingness and capacity of poultry farmers to pay for extension services in Nasarawa State, Nigeria. At this research used a sample size of 120 poultry farmers. Simple descriptive statistics, Kuppuswamy scale and Logit regression model were used data analysis. The results showed that majority of the poultry farmers (87.5%) indicated their willingness to pay for extension services. In addition, the respondents had preferences for extension services on disease control and vaccination of poultry birds. Majority of the respondents (54.2%) in the study area had either a high capacity to pay for extension services while only 25% had a very high capacity to pay. Most of the respondents (56.7%) preferred to pay on individual extension services basis followed by a preference to pay on annual contract system of payment basis (21.7%). The Logit model, however, revealed that number of birds owned by a farmer and the number of extension services received by the farmer determined their willingness to pay for extension services. The study recommended that livestock extension delivery system in Nigeria should be restructured thorough agricultural extension transformation agenda to allow for private livestock extension outfits to take off in Nigeria.


1. Apantaku, S. O., Omotayo, A. M. and Oyesola, A. B. (1998). Poultry Farmers‟ Willingness to Participate in Nigerian Agricultural Insurance Scheme in Ogun State, Nigeria. In: Oduguwa O.O, Fanimo, A. O., and Osinwo O. A. (Eds). Proceeding of the Silver Anniversary Conference. Nigerian Society for Animal Production. Gateway Hotel, Abeokuta, 21-26 March 1998, pp. 542.
2. Aryal , K. P., Chaudhary, P., Pandit, S and Sharma. G. 2009. Consumers‟ Willingness to Pay for Organic Products: A Case from Kathmandu Valley.” Journal of Agriculture and Environment 10: 15–26.
3. Asrat, P., K. Belay, and D. Hamito. (2004). “Determinants of farmers‟ willingness to pay for Soil Conservation Practices in the Southeastern Highlands of Ethiopia.” Land Degradation and Development 15: 423–438.
4. Bernet, T., Ortiz, O., Estrada, R. D., Quiroz, R., Swinton, S. M. (2001). Tailoring Agricultural Extension to Different Production contexts: A User-friendly Farm Household Model to Improve Decision making for Participatory Research. Agricultural Systems 69: 183-198.
5. Birner, R., Davis, K., Pender, J., Nkonya, E., Anandajayasekeram, P., Ekboir, J., Mbabu, A., Spielman, D., Horna, D., and Benin, S. (2006). “From Best Practice Fit:” A framework for analyzing agricultural advisory services worldwide. Development strategy and governance division, Discussion paper No. 39. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, D.C.
6. Chapman, R. and Tripe, R. (2003). Changing incentives for Agricultural Research and Extension Network. Overseas Development Institute, London, U.R.
7. Farrington, J. (1994). Public sector agricultural extension: Is there life after structural adjustment? Natural Resource Perspectives, No. 2. Overseas Development Institute, London.
8. Farrington J., Christopolos I., Kidd A., Beckman M. (2002). Can extension contribute to rural poverty reduction? Synthesis of a six country study. Agricultural Research and Extension Network, Paper No. 123. Overseas Development Institute, London.
9. Horna, J. D., Smale, M and Oppen, M. V. (2005). Farmers‟ Willingness to Pay for Seed Related Information: Rice Varieties in Nigeria and Benin. Environment and Production Technology Division Discussion Paper 142. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
10. Idachaba, F. S. (2005): Agricultural and Rural Development in Nigeria. „The policy perspective,‟ A text of Convocation Lecture
Delivered at K. S. U. Anyigba on 11 March 2005 pp: 3 - 4.
11. Kidd A., Lamers J., Ficarelli P., Hoffmann V. (2000): Privatising agricultural extension: caveat emptor. Journal of Rural Studies, 16: 95–102.
12. NPC. (2006). National Population Commission: Provisional of 2006 Nigeria Census Results. National Population commission, Abuja.
13. Oladele, O. I. (2008). “Factors Determining Farmers‟ Willingness to Pay for Extension Services in Oyo State, Nigeria.” Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica 41 (4): 165-170.
14. Pender, J. L., and Kerr, J. M.W. (1998). “Determinants of Farmers Indigenous Soil and Water Conservation Investments in Semi-Arid India.” Agricultural Economics 19: 113–125.
15. Ravi Kumar, B. P., Shankar Reddy Dudala, Rao A. R. (2012). Kupuswamy‟s Socio- Economic Status Scale - A Revision of Economic Parameter For 2012. International Journal of Research and Development of Health, ISSN: 2321-1431.
16. Rivera, W. (2001). Agriculture and rural extension worldwide. Options for institutional reform in the developing countries. FAO, Rome.
17. Rivera, W., Zijp, W., Gary, A. (2000). Contracting for Extension: Review of Emerging Practices. AKIS Good Practice Note, Agricultural Knowledge Information System (AKIS). Thematic Group, Washington, D. C. : World Bank.
18. Ulimwengu, J and Sanyal P. (2011). Joint Estimation of Farmers‟ Stated Willingness to Pay for Agricultural Services. IFPRI Discussion Paper 01070.
19. Umeh, G. N and Udo, B. I. (2002). Profitability of Poultry Production among School Leavers in Anaocha Local government Area of Anambra state, Nigeria. The Nigeria Journal of Animal Production, 29: 17-77.